Every year 1000s of innocent Indian husbands are charged with false DOWRY cases. Their innocent parents, young sisters & mothers are arrested, jailed without warrant. Some have died. Some have committed suicide unable to bear injustice. The law that was made to protect vulnerable women is being misused by unscrupulous women with connivance of others

Monday, March 31, 2008

SWAMINOMICS : Black money saves financial sector : Article from Times of India


Black money saves financial sector : Article from Times of India

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Black_money_saves_financial_sector/articleshow/2910592.cms


SWAMINOMICS

Black money saves financial sector

30 Mar 2008, 0037 hrs IST,Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar

A housing boom-and-bust has engulfed the US financial sector in crisis. India, too, has experienced a runaway real estate boom, which in a few areas is going bust. The share prices of real estate companies have crashed. Yet, India has no mortgage crisis or financial sector crisis.

Why not? Mainly because of the huge amount of black money in Indian real estate. This has saved the Indian financial sector in unexpected ways. Traditionally, US mortgage lenders checked the creditworthiness of borrowers, and then made the borrower pay at least 20% of the house value, loaning the remaining 80%. So, even if the price of the house dipped, it would still be higher than the bank's loan, and the borrower had an incentive to repay it.

However, in recent years, US banks relaxed loan conditions to increase lending volumes and profits. They began giving loans equal to the entire value of the house, so borrowers had no personal equity stake at all. Many lenders stopped checking the creditworthiness of borrowers. Ultimately, this led to loans to persons with no documented income, job or assets. Very risky!

Moreover, the US financial system created something called securitisation of home loans. Instead of retaining loans on their own books, banks chopped and bundled together thousands of loans, calling the bundle a mortgage-backed security. These securities were then sold to investors, who earned a high return provided borrowers paid regularly. In effect, banks originating home loans re-sold these, and no longer had to worry about defaults.

This led, inevitably, to malpractice. Many banks offered 'teaser' loans. These initially carried very low interest rates, which re-set after a few years at much higher rates. This attracted many low-income people since the monthly installments were initially low. But when the loans re-set higher, some poor borrowers could not repay. The bank originating the loan was unconcerned, having already sold the loan.

In this way, US home lending — and prices — shot up. As long as the economy and housing market were sunny, borrowers paid installments regularly. But eventually housing prices peaked, and then fell. Many owners with loans covering 100% of home cost now found that their homes were worth less than their outstanding loans. So, many borrowers opted to give up the property and rid themselves of the accompanying bank loan. They simply posted the home keys back to the banks.

US banks now face borrowers who can't pay for want of income, plus those who won't pay for properties worth less than the accompanying debt. Mortgage-backed securities are falling in value as underlying defaults rise. The fall in value was initially estimated at $100 billion, is now estimated at $600 billion, and will exceed a trillion dollars if home prices keep falling (as seems likely). This has inflicted huge losses on holders of the mortgage-backed securities, including the biggest banks in the world — Citibank and Bank of America. Many holders of these securities — such as investment bank Bear Stearns — will die or be forced to merge with more solvent entities.

Why does this not happen in India? Here, too, banks have increased lending aggressively for housing in the last five years. Here too, many banks finance the entire house value.

But Indian borrowers do not walk away from their homes — and loans — if prices dip. This is because a large proportion, often half, of almost all home purchases is paid in black money. If a house is sold for Rs 100 lakh, the official registered value will typically be only Rs 50 lakh, with the balance paid under the table in cash.

A bank may loan Rs 50 lakh, covering the entire formal price. However, the owner's contribution is not zero: he has paid Rs 50 lakh in black. To preserve that black investment, he will keep paying his installments even if house prices dip.

US banks give non-recourse loans — that is, the loan is secured only by the mortgaged property, and the borrower becomes debt-free if he returns the property. This is not so in Europe, where the borrower remains personally liable even after returning the mortgaged property, so the bank can seize his other assets. This discourages default. Hence, European banks are not suffering the way US ones are. Ditto for Indian banks.

When economic conditions get tough, defaults go up. In the last year, defaults have risen in Indian real estate, but mainly on account of commercial builders. The default rate remains modest for home-owners.

Now, the Indian legal system is so slow that borrowers have little fear of even their mortgaged homes being seized, let alone other assets. Yet, they do not default, and India's financial system remains strong.

The reason is that banks enjoy, without asking for it, a huge safety margin provided by the black money invested by every home owner. To preserve this black investment, borrowers will do their level best not to default and lose their property. Ironically, black money enforces loan discipline in India, far more effectively than formal contracts or legal processes.


Friday, March 28, 2008

When in India ?? At-home kit keeps paternity testing private


At-home kit keeps paternity testing private

BY GEORGEA KOVANIS • FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER • March 28, 2008

From : Freep.com

They probably won't put Maury Povich out of business -- after all, there will always be people who are willing to find out the paternity of their child on national television.

But for those who are more private, there's something new on the market: at-home paternity tests.

Earlier this week, Rite Aid announced it was carrying the Identigene DNA Paternity Test Collection Kit at 4,363 stores in 30 states and the District of Columbia.

Regionally, Meijer stores have been selling the Identigene kits -- which retail for $29.99 -- since last fall.

The testing procedure is easy: Swab the inside of the cheeks of the mother and child and the man who is believed to be the father.

Send the swabs to the Identigene lab, along with $119 to process the results. In three to five days after it arrives at the lab, you'll know whether the man in question is the baby's daddy.

Results are confidential and available by mail, e-mail or through a secured Web site. The at-home tests are said to be faster than other options.

This test won't hold up in court. But for an extra $200, Identigene can coordinate a test that will pass legal muster.

Rite Aid, which tested the product on the West Coast last fall, won't provide information on sales or who is buying the kits.

And Meijer won't give details on how sales have been except to say that people are buying the kits.

Craig Fogg, chief operation officer of Identigene, says his company's research shows that about 60% of the people who purchase the kit are women and that most of those women are in their 20s. About 30% of the women who buy the tests say they are buying them for someone else.

Contact GEORGEA KOVANIS at 313-222-6842 or gkovanis@freepress.com.


Source URL :
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080328/FEATURES01/803280332

Press release - Protect Indian Family Foundation


Protect Indian Family Foundation

3, Tulsi Bhavan, S.N.Road, Mulund(W),

Mumbai-400 080, Tel: 022 25904171, 9224335577, 9869323538

Email: info@protectindianfamily.org | Web: www.protectindianfamily.org

 

                                                                                                            

Press ReleaseWomen against Misuse of Women-Protection Laws

 

Mothers and Sisters Initiative (MASI) and All India Forgotten Women(AIFW) are organisations working towards the objectives of promoting family harmony and fighting legal terrorism (carried out through the misuse of women-protection laws). Protect Indian Family Foundation (PIF, a part of the umbrella group Save Indian Family Foundation-SIFF), is conducting this press conference in continuation of the National Events conducted by MASI and AIFW in last one month as mentioned below.

Women members of SIFF conducted a Dharna at Vidhan Shabha in Lucknow on 2nd March, 2008, conducted a Press Conference in Bangalore on 3rd March and a Press Conference and Seminar in Hyderabad on 5th March, and a Dharna in Delhi on 8th March, to highlight the consequences of women's empowerment gone awry. Through these events, we would like to bring to light the plight of the "forgotten women", who have actually been dis-empowered and whose basic human rights are being violated by the police and judiciary in the name of women's rights, protection and empowerment. We seek to highlight the woes of thousands of mothers and sisters who have been ignored and written off by organizations claiming to work for women's welfare.

We stand for Protection of Women, but against misuse of Women protection laws.

 

Over the last 60 years many policies have been instituted in the country in the name of women's liberation and empowerment. Special laws have been passed specifically in the name of women's protection such as IPC Section 498A (law against marital cruelty and dowry harassment) and Domestic Violence Law. Unfortunately, there are no safeguards to prevent misuse of these protective provisions.

 

These "women-protection laws", which are in essence wife-protection laws, assume that wives are always honest victims and would never jeopardize their own family life by making false claims of abuse. The draconian law, IPC Section 498A, in particular, allows the arrest of the husband and his male and female relatives, irrespective of their age, martial status or even health condition, solely on the basis of allegations of a wife, without any evidence or investigation.

 

Owing to this blind assumption and due to the absence of inherent checks and balances to prevent misuse of the laws, many innocent mothers-in-law, sisters-in-law and other female relatives of husbands are arrested and harassed through long-drawn legal proceedings that last several years.

 

Several authorities have noted that in close to 98% of cases filed under Section 498A, the accusations are false and that the complaints were only filed with ulterior motives.

 

Nevertheless, minor girls, pregnant women, married and unmarried sisters, ailing mothers and even aged grandmothers have been sent behind bars and prosecuted based on mere allegations. Young mothers are either torn away from their children or imprisoned along with them leaving indelible scars on the minds of the mothers and the children.

 

Many mothers and sisters are heart-broken to see their sons and brothers lose their youth, their health, their jobs, all their earnings, and sometimes even their lives, as they are mercilessly tortured by their estranged wives, aided by lawyers, police and the judiciary. Some women have ended their lives unable to bear the humiliation of being accused and arrested, and the trauma of making endless trips around the courts.

 

l  Noted activist Madhu Kishwar acknowledged that IPC Section 498A is heavily misused, and that a significant proportion of individuals who approach "Manushi" these days are mothers-in-law and husbands who are falsely accused.

 

l  Renowned IPS officer Kiran Bedi admitted that many poor and illiterate mothers-in-law and sisters-in-law, who are falsely charged under IPC Section 498A are languishing in prison every year.

 

l  The Supreme Court of India has labelled the misuse of IPC Section 498A as "legal terrorism".

 

l  The Delhi High Court recently stated that IPC Section 498A is the most abused provision.

 

l  The World Health Organization, in its report on India clearly cited Section 498A as one of the major reasons for the "Increasing Abuse of the Elderly in India".

 

l  Recently, the National Human Rights Commission noted that the Tihar jail is overflowing with people falsely accused under dowry cases.

 

l  A look at the crime records shows that every 20 minutes an innocent woman is arrested under IPC Section 498A.

 

In addition to penalizing innocent women, a large backlog of false cases in our highly corrupt and inefficient legal system prevents genuine victims of abuse from obtaining justice. Through IPC Section 498A the police and the legal fraternity are protecting those women who indulge in perjury, blackmail, extortion and harassment of their husbands and in-laws.

 

Despite having such compelling evidence that more harm than good is being done to women through IPC Section 498A, none of the leading women's organizations, law makers nor the Ministry for Women and Child Welfare have taken any measures to arrest misuse of this law. 

 

All the warnings, requests, recommendations and demands from several quarters to amend IPC Section 498A have fallen on deaf ears. Even before fixing the flaws in IPC Section 498A the Domestic Violence Law was introduced in 2006 with similar loopholes and without public discussion. Misuse of the Domestic Violence law began very soon after its introduction, and under its provisions a number of elderly mothers-in-law have been thrown out of their own homes by their daughters-in-law..

 

It is customary for women's organizations to trivialize the extent of misuse of these laws by women and to exaggerate statistics of dowry harassment, dowry death and domestic abuse. It is also customary for women's rights activists to deny domestic abuse against our fathers, brothers and sons. However, recent data from the National Crime Bureau indicates that nearly twice as many married men, compared to married women, commit suicide every year, unable to withstand verbal, emotional, economic and physical abuse and legal harassment. While every death of a young married woman is converted into a case of dowry death leading to immediate arrest of the husband and in-laws, large-scale suicides of men do not cause any outrage in the society.

 

Is the pain of a mother who lost a son to domestic abuse or legal terrorism any less than that of a mother who lost a daughter? How many more mothers and sisters should lose their sons and brothers before measures are taken to alleviate their sufferings? .

 

It is often assumed that only men get victimized in false dowry cases. This is not true. The reality is that an innocent woman is arrested in every 20 minutes. The real victims of dowry harassment seldom go to police and it's the innocents who get jailed. Every year 30,000 innocent women get jailed without evidence or investigation in dowry cases, ie. A woman every 20 minutes(Source NCRB).

 

Aren't mothers and sisters women? Don't they deserve a life of dignity and respect?

 

Does penalizing innocent mothers and sisters under false cases bring justice to genuinely abused women?

 

Does women's empowerment mean destroying family harmony and creating a fatherless society?

 

Is protection of women's rights synonymous with gross violation of basic human rights?

 

Is legal terrorism the solution to all women's problems?

 

These are the questions we ask the public, women's organizations, police, legal fraternity, bureaucrats and politicians in our Press Conference on the 2nd of April 2008.

 

Our specific demands to the government on this day are:

 

  1. Police involvement in counselling should be banned.

Marriage is not a crime and marital disputes are not crimes either. Where there is no evidence of physical harm or threat to life or limb, the police should not be allowed to arrest anyone. The police should not be allowed to randomly summon a husband and his family members to the police station in the name of counseling or questioning in case of marital disputes.

 

  1. Section 498A of IPC should be made bailable.

Section 498A, being non-bailable, allows punishing the accused by imprisonment even before guilt is established. This goes against the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which states that everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. Abused women need protection, but placing unconditional faith in the statements of a woman and confining the accused husband and his family in police or judicial custody, until bail is granted by a court, is not the way to accord protection to women.

 

  1. Section 498A of IPC should be made non-cognizable.

Innocent citizens are being arrested everyday based on mere complaints without requiring evidence or investigation. Even children and senior citizens are not being spared. IPC 498A, being a cognizable offence, violates a citizen's right to due process.

 

  1. IPC 498A and Domestic Violence Law should be made gender neutral.

Domestic abuse is not gender specific. The assumption that victims of physical, verbal, emotional, sexual, and financial abuse are always women is wrong. According the Universal Declaration of Human Rights "all are equal before the law, and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law". Hence, our fathers, brothers, sons and husbands should also be accorded protection from physical, verbal, emotional, sexual, and financial abuse by women.

 

  1. Persons who misuse IPC 498A and Domestic Violence Law should be penalized.

Misuse of the process of law not only costs the public exchequer dearly, but also destroys the personal lives of many innocent citizens. Misuse of law should be treated as a serious crime, and persons who use women-protection laws as weapons for settling personal scores in marital disputes should be severely punished.                        

 

Save Indian Family(SIF) is a strong team of dedicated families comprising of victims of "misuse of 498a", including NRIs, Senior citizens who campaign and create awareness about gross injustice and abuse that happen in Indian Legal system.  Protect Indian Family is one of the NGO members in SIF, based in Mumbai. SIF has over 20 NGOs and 50,000 individuals as its members across the globe.

24-hour All India Helpline Number: +91-09243473794
Delhi: 9810611534,
Mumbai: 9869323538
Kolkata: 9830151555,
Chennai: 9884607376,
Hyd'bad: 09848280354,
B'lore: 9845143724,
Pune: 9923056460
More helplines at: http://mynation.net/contact-us

 

Supported by :

 

www.saveindianfamily.org

www.mynation.net

www.savefamily.org

www.asha-kiran.org
www.sahanaindia.org
www.ghrs.in
www.498a.org
www.forgottenwomen.org

 

Thanks

 

Protect Indian Family (www.protectindianfamily.org)

9869323538 (M.R.Gupta), 9821414336 (P.R.Gokul) , 9224335577(Vikram Ahuja)


Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Unmarried Female on pill, delivers a baby in toilet


If a female has an extramarital and DELIVERS a baby in toilet that is a case for "...extra sex education...."

However if a male has an extramarital affair, he is accused of every possible vice and made a victim of the legal system ...



regards
vinayak

============= news item ===============


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Teenager_on_pill_delivers_in_toilet/articleshow/2896498.cms

Teenager on pill delivers in toilet

25 Mar 2008, 0245 hrs IST,Radha Sharma ,TNN

AHMEDABAD: In a freak case that underlines the need for compulsory sex education in schools, a class XI girl who used an emergency contraceptive pill to prevent an unwanted pregnancy, and was at peace with herself, recently delivered a 3-kg baby in the toilet bowl.

Apparently, she was plump and had no clue that she was pregnant. Doctors at VS Hospital here were shocked when the girl, who was admitted to the hospital recently after she delivered the child in the toilet of her home, told them that she never realised she was pregnant.

She told the doctors that she thought she had taken care of the possibility of being pregnant by popping an emergency contraceptive pill within three days of having unprotected sex with a boy she had a fling with.

"The girl said she took an emergency contraceptive pill and forgot all about it. It may be a possibility that she took the pill later than the advised time period. It may also be that she may have indulged in sex even after having the pill thinking it will offer her protection later as well," said attending gynaecologist Rajal Thaker.

Thaker, who has taken sex education lectures with over 3,500 girls in Ahmedabad, apart from imparting sex education to visually-challenged girls from all over the state, concedes that this case lays strong emphasis on the urgent need of re-introducing compulsory sex education to school children which was recently scrapped by the state government following protests from certain sections.

"The case also shows the complete breakdown on communication in nuclear families where the parents, who are also educated, did not notice that the girl was pregnant for the whole of nine months," says Thaker.

================ end of news item ==============
 
regards, vinayak

My post above is Subject to
----------------------------
1. My idea of *self help* which is very essential : http://tinyurl.com/pxcfz
2. Standard disclaimers as in http://tinyurl.com/947u9
3. A short preamble : http://tinyurl.com/hatew

Dowry Law Misuse : http://tinyurl.com/tdkx6 , http://tinyurl.com/v5vp8

Blogs :
http://tinyurl.com/3arv2w
http://bareact.blogspot.com/2006/12/divorce-why-now.html
http://tinyurl.com/2tb3s7
http://tinyurl.com/2dkub4
http://tinyurl.com/23xppp

http://vinayak.jconserv.net/index.php

http://www.bloglines.com/blog/eVinayak
http://bareact.blogspot.com/
http://my2cw.blogspot.com/

Seek advise : All India contact Nos : http://tinyurl.com/vntjz
alternate URL
http://www.blurty.com/users/vinayak/day/2006/12/10




Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Monday, March 17, 2008

The supposedly harassed wife and the REALLY harassed mother in law : Supreme Court's verdict !!


http://www.dailypioneer.com/indexn12.asp?main_variable=NATION&file_name=nt4%2Etxt&counter_img=4

Maintenance obligation of husband alone, says SC

*Abraham Thomas | New Delhi*

A "harassed" wife who sought a pound of her mother-in-law's flesh came in for a shock when the Supreme Court disbelieved her account and instead ordered compensation for the "harassed" mother-in-law.

The aggrieved wife, Sonalben R Desai had claimed that since her husband had refused to pay the maintenance of a sum of Rs 10,000 per month fixed by the Gujarat High Court, his parents should be held responsible to pay in his place.

The law (Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act 1956) did not provide for this argument. But Sonalben, an advocate by profession, proceeded on the basis that her husband has a share in the property owned by her in-laws. Hence, her right of maintenance can be accrued from the joint family property. Her mother-in-law owned the property in question.

The court however refused to accept this plea. Maintenance is a "personal obligation" of the husband alone, said the Bench of Justices SB Sinha and VS Sirpurkar. "The property in the name of the mother-in-law can neither be a subject matter of attachment nor during the lifetime of the husband, his personal liability to maintain his wife can be directed to be enforced against such property," it added.

But what shocked the court was the conduct of the wife in causing incessant harassment to her in-laws, who were both aged and ill. Commenting on the High Court order granting maintenance in her favour, the Bench said, "The said orders might have been passed only on consideration that Sonalben is a harassed lady, but the fact that the appellant (mother-in-law) is also a much harassed lady was lost sight of. She has more sinned than sinning."

The court made this comment on observing that the wife had filed several cases against her husband and in-laws ranging from dowry harassment, physical torture to criminal intimidation and cheating.

Less than a year after getting married to Jitendra Ajitbhai Patel, a US-based NRI, she instituted a criminal case against the husband and his parents charging them of criminal breach of trust (IPC Section 406). It was an admitted fact that the husband incurred huge losses in business following which they fell apart. The trial court hearing the case had ordered attachment of the property belonging to the husband's mother. Till date a maintenance sum of Rs one lakh was also paid to the wife.

At one point, the bench expressed its anguish over the wife's conduct and said, "the respondent (wife) speaks of her own human rights, forgetting the human rights of the appellant (mother-in-law)" adding further, "she (appellant) did not deserve such harsh treatment at the hands of the High Court."

Ordering forthwith release of property from attachment, the court asked the wife to refund the amount of Rs one lakh received by her at six per cent interest. Besides the court also directed the wife to pay Rs 50,000 as cost of litigation to the mother-in-law.

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Police forget why they sought Interpol notice



http://www.deccan.com/City/Citynews.asp

Police forget why they sought Interpol notice

Hyderabad, March 13: The Anantapur police is not aware of a 39-year-old woman against whom it got the Interpol to issue a red corner notice (RCN). Based on a request from the Anantapur police, the Crime Investigation Department (CID) had requested Interpol to issue the RCN against one Pandilipalli Venkata Ramani of Anantapur. The Interpol website displays the notice against the woman. The list of Interpol notices on the website of the CBI also has a link to the RCN against Ramani. The Anantapur however does not know who she is. "My predecessor must have requested for the RCN," the Anantapur superintendent of police, Mr Stephen Ravindra, told this newspaper.

"It does not seem to be an important case." The Interpol notice says that the woman is wanted on a charge of kidnapping, but the CID officials say she is wanted in a bigamy case. Anantapur police officials feigned complete ignorance about the RCN. CID officials say a case under IPC sections for dowry harassment, bigamy and some other offences are registered against Ramani. They say that the case was registered by the Anantapur police about two years ago; the woman is in the US. According to them, she got married to one Prabhakar Reddy fully knowing that he was already married. CID officials were not able to explain how the Interpol listed kidnappings as the category of offence against her.

NRI doc deposes through videoconferencing



http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=3fa40c17-69fe-463b-97f4-8a3cff0d0998&MatchID1=4663&TeamID1=5&TeamID2=2&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1173&PrimaryID=4663&Headline=NRI's+statement+on+videoconferencing

ALTERNATE URL :
http://tinyurl.com/2q54ph


NRI doc deposes through videoconferencing

Press Trust Of India
New Delhi, March 15, 2008
First Published: 21:53 IST(15/3/2008)
Last Updated: 22:03 IST(15/3/2008)


A Delhi court on Saturday  created history by recording the statement of an NRI doctor through video-conferencing, setting a trend that may save several others like him from the trouble of coming to the country to attend judicial proceedings.

A sessions court recorded the statement of the doctor in New Jersey in the US through VC in a case related to his divorce petition and legal battle with his estranged wife over the possession of their two daughters.

The additional district judge in the Tis Hazari district court complex recorded the statement with the help of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) officials with the Consulate General at the US.

Representatives of both the parties were present in the court to authenticate the deposition and cross-examination of the doctor in the case.

"The historic step taken by the court for conducting VC facilities is a welcome step. This would definitely help in early disposal off cases related to people who are staying abroad and are unable to come to India," Naveen Kumar Matta, the counsel for Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) told PTI here.

Earlier, the court had accepted the doctor's proposal to organise the video-conferencing at his expense after the Indian consulate officials informed the court that they did not have the facility for it.

The doctor got married when he came to India in 1994 and returned to the US along with his wife.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


regards, vinayak

My post above is Subject to
----------------------------
1. My idea of *self help* which is very essential : http://tinyurl.com/pxcfz
2. Standard disclaimers as in http://tinyurl.com/947u9
3. A short preamble : http://tinyurl.com/hatew

Dowry Law Misuse : http://tinyurl.com/tdkx6 , http://tinyurl.com/v5vp8

Blogs :
http://tinyurl.com/3arv2w
http://bareact.blogspot.com/2006/12/divorce-why-now.html
http://tinyurl.com/2tb3s7
http://tinyurl.com/2dkub4
http://tinyurl.com/23xppp

http://vinayak.jconserv.net/index.php

http://www.bloglines.com/blog/eVinayak
http://bareact.blogspot.com/
http://my2cw.blogspot.com/

Seek advise : All India contact Nos : http://tinyurl.com/vntjz
alternate URL
http://www.blurty.com/users/vinayak/day/2006/12/10




Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Scarlett murder accused had assaulted me: UK woman : News article from Times of India

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Scarlett_murder_accused_had_assaulted_me_UK_woman/articleshow/2856467.cms

Scarlett murder accused had assaulted me: UK woman

12 Mar 2008, 0103 hrs IST,TNN

PANAJI: Close on the heels of the Scarlett Keeling murder, a 51-year-old British woman has alleged that she was assaulted by a man called Samson, who hurled a racist abuse at her.

Gaile Jones Brown alleged that she was attacked outside a restaurant in Utorda by one Samson on January 7. On Tuesday she met North Goa SP Bosco George to verify if it was the same Samson D'Souza who was sent to two-week police custody in the Scarlett murder case.

Gaile alleged that Samson had kicked her in the groin and said, "I am a proud Goan and you are White tourist bitches enjoying your holidays in Goa." She said she had complained at Verna PS but it had not amounted to much. "I was also told not to pursue the case as he's involved with the drug mafia and my life would be in danger," she said.

Meanwhile, Samson D'Souza, who was arrested on March 9 in connection with Scarlett's murder on February 18, on Tuesday filed a bail application before the sessions judge in Panaji. Two more persons, Julio Lobo from Siolim and Placido Carvalho of Anjuna, also filed applications for anticipatory bail. All three applications will come up for hearing Wednesday.

Goa CM Digamber Kamat ruled out a CBI probe into Scarlett's death as sought by her mother Fiona MacKeown and said he was optimistic that police would soon solve the case. "I have full faith in the officers. There's no need for a CBI inquiry," he said. The CM also sought to blame Fiona. "The mother should have cared for her children. She left her minor daughter with someone else. Tourists visiting here should be careful."

The Goa police too is training its guns on Fiona, who was in Karnataka on the night of her daughter's death. Under the Goa Children's Act, 2003, and Juvenile Justice Act, neglecting a minor is a serious offence punishable by a maximum of six months in jail and a fine. A top police official said, "For a mother to leave her child alone in Goa is a violation of both Acts."

Fiona responded, "There has been a breach of trust. I trusted people, who promised to take care of my daughter, but didn't."


....case was being stalled because of connections between the state government, the state police and the local drug mafia......


Keeling mom slams Goa police, govt

Published: Sunday, 16 March, 2008, 07:08 AM Doha Time

Fiona MacKeown (right) and her lawyer Vikram Verma speak to the media before entering the police station in Panjim yesterday
NEW DELHI: Fiona MacKeown, the mother of 15-year-old British girl Scarlett Keeling who was raped and killed in the Indian state of Goa, yesterday alleged that the case was being stalled because of connections between the state government, the state police and the local drug mafia.


MacKeown, who was summoned earlier yesterday by the Goa police to help in investigations and record her statement, said: "I have been informed that there is a strong nexus between drug mafia, Ravi Naik (the state Home Minister) and Director General of Goa Police B S Brar," the PTI news agency reported.

The police questioned MacKeown, 43, about failing to provide a safe environment for her young daughter. Speaking after being served the summons, MacKeown said the police were "scaremongering."

MacKeown's lawyer Vikram Varma said the initial summons given to the mother appeared to relate to whether she was negligent in leaving her daughter in Goa. Facing media criticism, the police had backed down from this line of questioning, he said.

MacKeown also said that Naik and Brar have full knowledge of crime-related activities in the state and have done their best to protect criminals.

MacKeown's eldest daughter, Scarlett was raped and murdered on Goa's popular Anjuna beach on February 18.

Police investigations have focussed on two accused - Samson D'Souza, a barman, and Placido Carvalho, a suspected drug dealer.

While D'Souza is charged with drugging, raping and killing the girl, Carvalho has been accused of drugging and conspiring with D'Souza in the murder.

Goa's state police initially claimed that an autopsy of Keeling indicated it was a case of drowning.

But after MacKeown accused them of a cover-up, a second autopsy was carried out and a fresh investigation began, treating the death as a possible murder.

A police sub-inspector Nerlon Albuquerque was suspended on charges of laxity in the initial investigation into Keeling's death.

The doctor who conducted the first autopsy on Keeling claimed last week that the police had ignored his finding that she could have been murdered.

During interrogation Carvalho reportedly said that Keeling had consumed large amounts of cocaine and alcohol when she entered a bar- cum-eatery run at a beachside shack where she met Carvalho who then gave her ecstasy tablets, according to a police official.

Carvalho then allegedly raped the girl who was in a semi-conscious state and left her on the beach.

Before that, D'souza, a barman working at the same shack, was seen in a "compromising position" with the girl by a witness, the official said.

Keeling was on a six-month backpacking holiday in India with MacKeown, her mother's partner and their six children since November 2007.

MacKeown has written a letter to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh requesting that the case be taken over by the federal Central Bureau of Investigation. She has also approached the British High Commission for help.

Indian media and lawyers have criticised police for failing in the past to properly investigate murder cases.

Keeling's case is the latest to highlight the safety of tourists in India. Tourism officials met this year to discuss attacks on tourists after at least seven foreign women and girls said they had been raped or molested. – Agencies


Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Hubby can be jailed despite patch-up


Hubby can be jailed despite patch-up
13 Mar 2008, 0144 hrs IST,Swati Deshpande,TNN

 MUMBAI: A high court bench comprising Chief Justice Swatanter Kumar, Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud and Justice J P Devadharowever has ruled that cruelty-to-wife cases can't be settled out of court. However, the three judges also held that an HC can definitely exercise its power under its inherent jurisdiction, and quash a 498-A complaint in the larger interests of justice, to maintain matrimonial harmony and to prevent abuse of the legal process. The court specified the principles of criminal jurisprudence that need to be followed.

The judgment essentially says that a husband or his family facing a charge under 498-A of inflicting physical or mental cruelty on the wife cannot effect a settlement with her even if the two have patched up or the woman has agreed to forgive her husband or if the charges are based on flimsy pretexts to begin with and prima facie false. This means the husband can get arrested and even convicted and sent to jail for up to three years.

But there could be a way out from the legal quagmire that a husband may find himself in once a 498-A case is slapped on him. For that, however, only the HC can help. The HC has to be moved for quashing of the first information report (FIR), probe or criminal proceedings. The judgment has held that a HC has the power to quash such non-compoundable offences so as "to secure the ends of justice". However, the judges also held that quashing of a complaint has to be on the basis of the facts of each case and the power must be "sparingly used".

The 102-page verdict said, "An offence of cruelty under IPC 498-A is not merely a crime between husband and wife but a crime against society, and therefore the parties themselves cannot compound the offence." The judges have, significantly, also held that not just offences under 498-A, but also other offences such as murder, rape, attempt to murder and causing grievous hurt—which are not specifically mentioned in the law as 'compoundable' offences—cannot be settled between the complainant and the accused. Section 320 of the CrPC lists offences that can be settled between parties at any stage of the prosecution.

The issue was referred to a full bench by a single judge of the Bombay high court who had to decide on an appeal filed by a Solapur-based husband Abasaheb Honmane who, after being held guilty of an aggravated form of bigamy and sentenced to jail for five years, had sought the leave of the court to compound the offence and also to set aside his conviction.

A full bench is normally formed in exceptional circumstances when there are conflicting judgments of two or more division benches. Here, it was a single judge who felt that a division bench judgment was not the correct interpretation of law and hence referred it to the Chief Justice since it was an important law point that needed to be settled.

Besides, before the court there were ten other similar cases on the question of compounding of offences such as robbery, dowry harassment, kidnapping, causing serious hurt with weapons, causing a miscarriage without the woman's consent and so on. In each case, the prayer was that the FIR should be quashed, as the complainant had agreed to settle the matter. Most of these cases had arisen out of disputes in a matrimonial relationship.

The Chief Justice, who wrote the judgment for the bench, noted, "No statute can provide for all situations when the legislature enacts a law." He said this as one of the points of reference was also whether the high court had the inherent powers to quash or compound complaints when this was not spelt out clearly in any law, including the CrPC, which is the procedural Bible for the criminal law courts.

The full bench held that Section 482 of the CrPC which speaks of the court's "inherent power" to pass any order to "meet the ends of justice" has "intentionally" been worded widely by the legislature to ensure a larger impact on the procedural law governing investigations and criminal trials. "The inherent powers of the high courts are not meant to be static just like the law is not static and develops and varies according to the progress of time and need of society."

The HC noted that until recently even a complaint of cheque bouncing was not compoundable but the government recently amended the law to allow parties to go in for "out-of-court settlements".

Amit Desai, an expert defence counsel, said, "There is a need for criminal law to be amended to make an offence such as Section 498-A compoundable. It is time for the legislature to consider a change in the law since these are private disputes."

The legislature has provided an alternative statute—the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, to provide greater safeguards and protection to women by providing for a chance of "resettlement of matrimonial home and relationship prior to actual registration of crime under Section 498-A of IPC".

But the legislature still did not make the Section 498-A offence compoundable. "While interpreting and implementing the law, legislative wisdom has to be given preference," the judgment said, adding, "It can very well be presumed that the legislature, while enacting a law, is aware of the difficulties faced in implementation of such a law."

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Mumbai/Hubby_can_be_jailed_despite_patch-up/articleshow/2859893.cms

========== end of news item ==================

 
regards, vinayak

My post above is Subject to
----------------------------
1. My idea of *self help* which is very essential : http://tinyurl.com/pxcfz
2. Standard disclaimers as in http://tinyurl.com/947u9
3. A short preamble : http://tinyurl.com/hatew

Dowry Law Misuse : http://tinyurl.com/tdkx6 , http://tinyurl.com/v5vp8

Blogs :
http://tinyurl.com/3arv2w
http://bareact.blogspot.com/2006/12/divorce-why-now.html
http://tinyurl.com/2tb3s7
http://tinyurl.com/2dkub4
http://tinyurl.com/23xppp

http://vinayak.jconserv.net/index.php

http://www.bloglines.com/blog/eVinayak
http://bareact.blogspot.com/
http://my2cw.blogspot.com/

Seek advise : All India contact Nos : http://tinyurl.com/vntjz
alternate URL
http://www.blurty.com/users/vinayak/day/2006/12/10




Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Missing Husband killed by wife

 
Missing Husband killed by wife

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2008/20080313/ldh1.htm#5

Mandi Ahmedgarh, March 12

Hapreet Kaur of Kadon village, mother of three, allegedly killed her husband Paritam Singh by serving him drug-laced liquor and throwing his body into a canal over five months ago. She told relatives and the police that he had gone to look for a job after attending Chhapar Mela on September 26.

Later, cracking under the pressure of the investigating team, she confessed to her crime before a social leader and surrendered before the police yesterday. Bhupinder Singh of Upplan, her paramour and co-accused, is still at large.

Earlier, a case had been registered after social and political organisations of the area started accusing the police of inaction in connection with a complaint lodged by the mother of the missing man.

Though his mother and wife had lodged separate complaints, accusing each other of killing him, the police registered a case against the wife.

Jagir Kaur, a widow, had alleged that her son had disappeared under mysterious circumstances. Accusing Harpreet Kaur of concealing the sequence of events leading to his disappearance, she urged the police to take action.

According to the Payal SHO, preliminary investigations revealed that Paritam Singh had retired from the Army last year and was not seen in the village after September 26. When Jagir Kaur asked Harpreet Kaur about his disappearance, she told her that he had gone to Chandigarh to take up a private job there.

Investigations revealed that she and Bhupinder Singh had allegedly killed Paritam Singh by mixing poison in his liquor on September 26 and throwing the body into the canal near the Gurthali bridge.

==================  end of news item ==================
regards, vinayak

My post above is Subject to
----------------------------
1. My idea of *self help* which is very essential : http://tinyurl.com/pxcfz
2. Standard disclaimers as in http://tinyurl.com/947u9
3. A short preamble : http://tinyurl.com/hatew

Dowry Law Misuse : http://tinyurl.com/tdkx6 , http://tinyurl.com/v5vp8

Blogs :
http://tinyurl.com/3arv2w
http://bareact.blogspot.com/2006/12/divorce-why-now.html
http://tinyurl.com/2tb3s7
http://tinyurl.com/2dkub4
http://tinyurl.com/23xppp

http://vinayak.jconserv.net/index.php

http://www.bloglines.com/blog/eVinayak
http://bareact.blogspot.com/
http://my2cw.blogspot.com/

Seek advise : All India contact Nos : http://tinyurl.com/vntjz
alternate URL
http://www.blurty.com/users/vinayak/day/2006/12/10




Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

Punjab govt passes new marriage act


Time of India - 13 Mar 2008

Punjab govt passes new marriage act
13 Mar 2008, 0332 hrs IST,TNN

CHANDIGARH: In order to counter the growing numbers of marriage frauds, especially those pertaining to NRIs who desert their spouses, Punjab government on Wednesday passed the Compulsory Registration of Marriages Bill, 2008.

The Bill, presented by justice minister Upinderjit Kaur, is also intended for compliance with directions of Supreme Court which were delivered in the Seema versus Ashwani Kumar case, 2005, seeking adoption of Compulsory Registration of Marriages Act in all states.

Objects and reasons cited in the Bill state that the legislation is meant to mitigate hardships faced by women in Punjab because of matrimonial disputes, bigamy or polygamy and about their legal right to property. It wants to prevent parents or guardians from selling daughters or young girls under the garb of marriage.

The Bill call for appointment of a chief registrar of marriages, district registrars of marriages and a registrar of marriages who will register marriages solemnized in the state under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872, Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act 1937, Anand Marriage Act, 1909 or any other custom of personal law related to marriages.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Punjab_govt_passes_new_marriage_act/articleshow/2860080.cmshttp://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Punjab_govt_passes_new_marriage_act/articleshow/2860080.cms

--------------- end of news item ---------------
 
regards, vinayak

My post above is Subject to
----------------------------
1. My idea of *self help* which is very essential : http://tinyurl.com/pxcfz
2. Standard disclaimers as in http://tinyurl.com/947u9
3. A short preamble : http://tinyurl.com/hatew

Dowry Law Misuse : http://tinyurl.com/tdkx6 , http://tinyurl.com/v5vp8

Blogs :
http://tinyurl.com/3arv2w
http://bareact.blogspot.com/2006/12/divorce-why-now.html
http://tinyurl.com/2tb3s7
http://tinyurl.com/2dkub4
http://tinyurl.com/23xppp

http://vinayak.jconserv.net/index.php

http://www.bloglines.com/blog/eVinayak
http://bareact.blogspot.com/
http://my2cw.blogspot.com/

Seek advise : All India contact Nos : http://tinyurl.com/vntjz
alternate URL
http://www.blurty.com/users/vinayak/day/2006/12/10




Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

NEWS - ....a rape convict sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment, was released the next day after availing of all sorts of remissions....

".....a rape convict sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment, was released the next day after availing of all sorts of remissions...."


PIL against rape convicts' remission

Chandigarh, March 11: Taking up a petition filed in public interest for quashing instructions for the grant of remission to rape convicts, a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court comprising Chief Justice Mr Vijender Jain and Mr Justice Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia today issued a notice of motion to the state of Punjab for 19 May.

In his petition filed on the basis of information received under the RTI Act from the superintendent of the Hoshiarpur District Jail, advocate Mr HC Arora had contended as many as 10 rape convicts had been prematurely released from that jail following the grant of remissions by the state from time to time. Certain convicts did not even undergo half the sentence awarded to them as they were granted remission. Besides, 11 more rape convicts had been granted remission from time to time, but were still in jails.

The petitioner claimed a rape convict, Surinder Singh, sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment, was released the next day after availing of all sorts of remissions.

n SNS


http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=2&theme=&usrsess=1&id=194833


 =============== end of news item ================
regards, vinayak

My post above is Subject to
----------------------------
1. My idea of *self help* which is very essential : http://tinyurl.com/pxcfz
2. Standard disclaimers as in http://tinyurl.com/947u9
3. A short preamble : http://tinyurl.com/hatew

Dowry Law Misuse : http://tinyurl.com/tdkx6 , http://tinyurl.com/v5vp8

Blogs :
http://tinyurl.com/3arv2w
http://bareact.blogspot.com/2006/12/divorce-why-now.html
http://tinyurl.com/2tb3s7
http://tinyurl.com/2dkub4
http://tinyurl.com/23xppp

http://vinayak.jconserv.net/index.php

http://www.bloglines.com/blog/eVinayak
http://bareact.blogspot.com/
http://my2cw.blogspot.com/

Seek advise : All India contact Nos : http://tinyurl.com/vntjz
alternate URL
http://www.blurty.com/users/vinayak/day/2006/12/10




Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

GENDER BIAS - GOVERNMENT IS THE NEXT TARGET !!



GENDER BIAS - GOVERNMENT IS THE NEXT TARGET !!

============= news item ===================

Woman IFS officer alleges sexual discrimination

New Delhi: Disappointed at being ignored for three key posts, a senior woman IFS officer has accused the Government of having "gender-bias" and "extraneous considerations" rather than professionalism in deciding high-level appointments.

Secretary-level officer Veena Sikri has written a strongly-worded letter to External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee, saying that she had been "discriminated against, both professionally and personally" in consideration of her request for Ambassadorship to the UN or UK and nomination to the Commonwealth.

Sikri, who had earlier raised questions over appointment of Shivshankar Menon as Foreign Secretary superseding her, said that she was deeply saddened by the fact that the country's governance was witnessing the tendencies of "regionalism and cronyism".

After being superseded by a two-year junior, the 1970-batch officer had requested that she be posted as India's Permanent Envoy to the UN, nomination as Commonwealth Secretary General or High Commissioner to London.

However, the request did not find favour with the Government.

"Officially, no reasons have been given for denying me these assignments," she said in letter to Mukherjee, adding "Informally, I have been told that I should not aspire to any of the top posts and that I am being punished for raising questions about the appointment of the Foreign Secretary."

The former high commissioner, who has been on protest leave for last 15 months, said: "I have the strong impression that of late it is extraneous considerations rather than professionalism, which regrettably influence high-level government appointments."

"In Parliament, government has made serious commitments to ensuring gender equality and strengthening the role of women in India's political, social and economic life. The situation on the ground, however, remains quite different," Sikri said in the March 3 letter.

"I would like to strongly reiterate the need for transparency, justice and objectivity, without either personal or gender-based bias, in government appointments at all levels if we are to have a bureaucracy committed to good and honest governance, so essential and critical for achieving our national objectives in domestic and foreign policy," she said.

Contending that she was the country's senior-most IFS with "consistently outstanding record", she said, "in my case, despite my professional qualifications, government has not responded to my letters and has made no effort to give any justice to me."

Sikri, who is due to retire by the year-end, suggested that the government even tried to "humiliate" her by offering a junior ambassadorship in lieu of the postings she wanted.

Sikri had earlier approached the Central Administrative Tribunal against appointment of Menon as Foreign Secretary.

Her husband Rajiv Sikri, who was also Secretary-level IFS officer, had also protested against Menon's appointment.


http://www.ibnlive.com/news/woman-ifs-officer-alleges-sexual-discrimination/61043-3.html




=============== end of news item ===========
 
regards, vinayak

My post above is Subject to
----------------------------
1. My idea of *self help* which is very essential : http://tinyurl.com/pxcfz
2. Standard disclaimers as in http://tinyurl.com/947u9
3. A short preamble : http://tinyurl.com/hatew

Dowry Law Misuse : http://tinyurl.com/tdkx6 , http://tinyurl.com/v5vp8

Blogs :
http://tinyurl.com/3arv2w
http://bareact.blogspot.com/2006/12/divorce-why-now.html
http://tinyurl.com/2tb3s7
http://tinyurl.com/2dkub4
http://tinyurl.com/23xppp

http://vinayak.jconserv.net/index.php

http://www.bloglines.com/blog/eVinayak
http://bareact.blogspot.com/
http://my2cw.blogspot.com/

Seek advise : All India contact Nos : http://tinyurl.com/vntjz
alternate URL
http://www.blurty.com/users/vinayak/day/2006/12/10




Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.