RCR is a strategy. aka RCR before the enemy acts
Dear _Pre_498a_Hubby_
Sad to hear your story
>
>1. Should I send a RCR to her at this stage?
>
Filing for RCR is NOT just a legal process. It is a strategy
While The general advantages of RCR are mentioned here, http://batteredmale.blogspot.com/2007/05/about-rcr.html or here http://tinyurl.com/29llmn .... One should be clear ABOUT one's strategy BEFORE filing RCR
- DO YOU WANT your wife BACK ?
- Let us say you file for RCR thinking that the RCR will give you legal advantages, IF the wife appears in court AFTER your RCR and claims that she will return and live with you, are you ready to tolerate her should she come back ?
Also note that we ask people to file an RCR, MAINLY to prove that (a) the husband is NOT the one sending the wife away, & (b) it was wife you placed un reasonable conditions and left the matimonial home !!
>
>2. Does the legal importance of RCR notice
>decline if it is sent after she files for
>divorce?
>
- NO. It does NOT diminish just because wife filed for Divorce. In fact your counter (or reply) to a possible divorce filed by the wife can be in the form of an RCR. You can refuse every one of her claims for divorce and see restitution of conjugal rights.
- Also, you can always file an RCR and state that you cannot forsake your parents.... BUT....BUT .... should your wife return back and create MORE problems for you at your present home are you mentally and socially ready to face that ??
These are the issues to be thought of BEFORE filing for RCR
However the benefit of an RCR WILL diminish if it is filed AFTER wife files a 498a - because many courts would look at that as a counter action / reaction and NOT a genuine case
>3. Considering that we were in
>_City_I_Live_in_ all the while (except for a
>joint trip to _Wife's_Parent's_city_ for 5
>days), can she file criminal cases in
>_Wife's_Parent's_city_?
There is ALWAYS the stupid possibility that the woman will and can file a FALSE 498A case in _Wife's_Parent's_city_, on a date you were NEVER there - stupid but has happened due to the terrible situation in our country - the logic or lack of logic here is that IF the WHOLE case is false, why can't the incident date be false ? it can ... sadly though
THERE IS ALSO the possibility that she will use your short visit to _Wife's_Parent's_city_ and file a case using that date
some miscl issues
>
>- Her jewellery (possibly fake?) is still
>lying untouched in a locker in
>_City_I_Live_in_. She did not claim it even at
>the time of leaving _City_I_Live_in_.
>
Who was operating this locker ?
Hope the bank has a clear record of who operates it ?
Hope she cannot unilaterally OPEN the locker and disappear with the fakes and come claiming for real ones tomorrow ??
More after hearing from you
>
>
>"________" <__________@...> wrote:
>
>Here's my story in brief:
>
>- Wife moved to _City_I_Live_in_, where I
>stay, after marriage on Mid 2006.
>
>- No dowry was taken, nor any demand made by
>us at any time.
>
>- Wife picked up job in _City_I_Live_in_ in
>later ___/2006.
>
>- Separated on Late____/2006, and she moved to
>an apartment in _City_I_Live_in_.
>
>- After separation, I made 2-3 attempts over 2
>months to get her back
>
>- Wife refused to return, asking for separate
>residence.
>
>I did not give in to demand, since my mother &
>sister stay with me.
>
>- Wife Quit her job in end 2006, and moved
>back to parents' home in _Wife's_Parent's_city_.
>
>- I wrote a letter to her father in early__/
>2007, highlighting her bad behaviour.
>
>- Got a legal notice in return, with wild
>accusations (dowry, ..... etc etc etc.)
>
>Notice offered divorce by mutual consent in
>exchange for 'suitable' maintenance.
>
>Else, it said that she will file for divorce
>in court.
>
>- I replied through my lawyer denying her
>allegations, asking her to return. Also
>mentioned that I am willing to discuss divorce
>if she is adamant. Rejected her claims of
>maintenance.
>
>- My lawyer's reply reached her on Mid ____
>2007. No response from them yet.
>
>- Her jewellery (possibly fake?) is still
>lying untouched in a locker in
>_City_I_Live_in_. She did not claim it even at
>the time of leaving _City_I_Live_in_.
>
>Need some suggestions here:
>
>1. Should I send a RCR to her at this stage?
>
>2. Does the legal importance of RCR notice
>decline if it is sent after she files for
>divorce?
>
>3. Considering that we were in
>_City_I_Live_in_ all the while (except for a
>joint trip to _Wife's_Parent's_city_ for 5
>days), can she file criminal cases in
>_Wife's_Parent's_city_?
>
>4. Any other thoughts/suggestions?
>
>Thanks, and regards,
>
>_Pre_498a_Hubby_
>

1 comments:
THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 ACT NO. 25 OF 1955
RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS AND JUDICIAL SEPARATION 9. Restitution of conjugal right. 9. Restitution of cojugal right. 1*** When either the husband or the wife has, without reasonable excuse, withdrawn from the society of the other, the aggrieved party may apply, by petition to the district court, for restitution of conjugal rights land the court, on being satisfied of the truth of the statements made in such petition and that there is no legal ground why the application should not be granted, may decree restitution of conjugal rights accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 The brackets and figure "(1)" omitted by Act 68 of 1976, s. 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 156 1[Explanation.-Where a question arises whether there has been reasonable excuse for withdrawal from the society, the burden of prov- ing reasonable excuse shall be on the person who has withdrawn from the society.]
13.(1A) Either party to a marriage, whether solemnized before or after the commencement of this Act, may also present a petition for the dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground- (i) that there has been no resumption of cohabitation as between the parties to the marriage for a period of 5[one year] or upwards after the passing of a decree for judicial separation in a proceeding to which they were parties; or (ii) that there has been no restitution of conjugal rights as between the parties to the marriage for a period of 5[one year] or upwards after the passing of a decree for restitution of conjugal rights in a proceeding to which they were parties.]
The above law of the hma may help you to understand the legal position, however,RCR may help you to obtain divorce.498a is a seperate case, issues are different there, you have to fight saperately for that.RCR may be opposed by your wife that his husband torchuring her and in that case you have to prove that you are not torchuring her. if you require any more advice be free to contact me on my email ads.
arupkumargupta@gmail.com.-akg
Post a Comment